(Or "Can a Story Really Do All of This?")
(Quick one: If stories can do this, then most of America should've transformed for the better after watching them on Netflix all 2020. They got more vicious. How does one, "fake story" get better results in tens of millions of people than all of Netflix's combined? Or maybe there's something special about it that makes it pierce hearts.) This article isn't going to go deep into archeology, theology, etc. It's just about what it says: whether the Bible is a good story that impacts people how it did. We'll take a deeper look into what people are really saying when they claim the Bible is just a story. I made this claim myself as a agnostic evolutionist who tore Christians up in debates. The most I'd let them get away about the Bible was that people believed it, learned moral lessons, and some changed. Stories and new beliefs can change people, esp good ones. That's gotta explain the Bible's impact.People sometimes report specific experiences from the book
before reading about them in the book. Many skeptics or opponents of
the main story claim unusual events or even supernatural ones (eg
incurable diseases healed) occurred before they believed its claims.
They tried talking to the imaginary God in the book, unusual things
happened, and then they
believed. All of this is already unusual for individuals briefly
exposed to works of fiction. Maybe groups of people will react
differently, without reproducing the results, to the fictional story
and character they're imagining.
The individuals that believe the story is true join clubs of
like-minded people. Their goal is to read more of the book
daily/weekly, do what it says, speak to the imaginary God as a group,
and get the results the imaginary character in it promises. They'll
also support each other like a family. The book said to do all these
things. So, they do them regularly.
Some invest a lot more time
into the book. They teach the
others to see real life in terms of the fictional book, relying on its
fictional God and theories more than themselves and wordly theories.
They often report greater results than they got from self-reliance at a
time when they didn't read or opposed the teachings of the book.
Others start sharing the main story widely. They tell both strangers
and people they know. At some point, people who heard a few minutes of
a story in a fictional book feel called to believe in it. The number of
people who believe in and surrender their lives to the imaginary
character of the book grows. These new groups of people report the same
kinds of experiences, including supernatural ones.
The new people are really different, too. Diverse audiences receive the
same, exact story before having the same experiences. They get the same
results from obeying the imaginary character's words. When results vary,
they vary in the ways the book says they will. The effect is reliable
across groups.
Maybe it's all a rare, special, psychological phenomenon that helps
people. If so, psychiatrists should want to understand and field it
more than any other group. What are its psychological effects? Most
report kicking bad habits. The story either totally eliminates or helps
people deal with anxiety, depression, and other mental conditions. Some
with hopeless, physical conditions either beat the odds or are
supernaturally cured. People stop doing hard drugs, being in gangs,
beating their wives/children, and other violent crimes.
There's also benefits. They report inner peace and joy that's
not dependent on circumstances. They start working harder on their
menial jobs instead of slacking. They invest more time into family,
friends, strangers, and communities. Their relationships improves along
with their character. They forgive enemies who hurt them. Others
experience internal
changes that let them endure, even peacefully, horrible conditions like
being quadriplegic. They report life circumstances changing in
unexpected ways after asking the character in the story for help.
Skeptics tell me all of this occurred because people heard a work of
fiction, talked to an imaginary character, had imaginary experiences,
and sustained them by regularly reading the same piece of incorrect
fiction and talking to the same non-existent character. That sounds...
unbelievable. In most things, those skeptics would say the results of a
belief speak for themselves. Compared to psychological findings, this
story has high impact across many people. While psychological theories
appear and are later debunked, this same story has consistently
achieved positive, psychological results. It's plenty rational to think
there's a supernatural force behind the Gospel making that story do
what it promises it will. I'm still up for putting the Bible to the
test as God's power or what stories do.
Let's do basic science. I challenge people who think "a story" did all of
that to get those results with
a story.
Get a large number of diverse people to inventory their life problems
(esp sins and lack of virtue), read a few minutes of quality fiction,
talk to an imaginary character in it, and regularly read incomplete
pieces of the same book with others. They should experience a certainty
it's true, start kicking bad habits, love others more, sometimes die
for them, and sometimes experience supernatural events like incurable
diseases being cured after asking for them. That's what it takes to
reproduce the individual experiences. I challenge each of you to change
your own life
by reading a few minutes of fiction speaking to imaginary people. If
you're right, many of you will get the Bible's results without the
Bible.
Next test for "Bible's just a story:" getting the results across
groups. I challenge you to share those non-Biblical, fictional stories
with people who have spent years struggling, bored, and finding no answers
to life's, deepest questions. Tell them they just need to believe about
2-5 minutes of your fiction, speak to invisible characters in it like
they're real, and one or more of those problems will be solved. If they
re-read it regularly, they'll stay solved.
Actually, we should already see this since people across the globe
constantly watch and discuss
fiction aimed at impacting their lives. Americans spent most of COVID/2020
watching Netflix. Whole country should've transformed for the better. If
this is psychological, those
should've had such strong, placebo effects by now that we disbanded
psychiatry, got most people off mind-altering drugs, and ditched most
self-help books. Our opponents claim a single
work of fiction achieved those kind of results already. So, a few
more of theirs should've sufficed to get the job done, including for them.
I know what they'll say: it works for some people, not for others, and
isn't universal. That would predict, as folks like Voltaire did, that
this story would mostly die off with the handful of Jewish writers that
made it 2,000 years ago. Or soon after with minimal effect. The God in
the story says His
word will go out and get
the results
He sent it for. Impossible results. Let's test that. His story (His
Word), without the Internet, spread across over 100 countries to over
1,000 people groups in about 2,000 languages reaching over a billion
people. It heavily impacted Western civilization, too.
Let me rephrase that in case it didn't sink in. The same story kept
getting the unlikely results it predicted as people heard it, believed,
and obeyed what it said to do. It worked for every type of person:
white/black/whatever, men/women/ex-trans, straight/ex-gay, rich/poor,
intellectual/simple, able-bodied/handicapped... every... type... of
person. That's universal. Anything that worked for every kind of person
and problem on Earth across the whole Earth would work for you. If just
a story, you all should be able to get these results with arbitrary or
at least really good stories. You haven't, you know you can't, and
that's why you aren't even trying to. At this point, you should know
it's not just a story. If not, what is it? And scientifically?
Instead of guessing, let's look at it via the lens of testable claims
vs real-world results. From a scientific perspective, the testable
claims of the Bible achieved reproducible results in what looks like
the largest, most diverse, and inclusive set of humans in all of human
history. It achieved both subjective and objective results. The
objective results include supernatural events that science can't
explain, but the story predicts, with global corroboration by
eyewitnesses across thousands of years. Both types of results show up
in highest concentration almost exclusively in devout followers of the
genuine Gospel with the effects increasing with obedience to its God.
The evidence is now in. The humans involved merely wrote down, read,
obey, study, discuss, and pass along both the story and rest of the
book. Just with that, the Bible should've had limited impact like all
the other stories. The massive, consistent impact that followed can
only occur if something beyond human psychology is making that story,
book, and activities surrounding them more effective. Therefore, the
most credible claim is that the Bible is the Word of God, it contains
the will of God, and its success is due to the Spirit of God.
Given the weight of all that, doesn't it make more sense as a rational
person to think the Gospel is true, believe its claims, and act on it?
If it say's we'll be judged, shouldn't we believe its claim that our
wrongdoings will earn us an eternity of severe punishment? Shouldn't we
believe the God behind it wants to forgive our sins, transform us, and
spend forever in lovingkindness to us? Shouldn't you ask Jesus to open
your heart to God, humble yourself, and listen hard to His Gospel? Do
you want to do that
now?
(Read the Gospel, learn to share it, read other essays, or back to home.)
(Credit: Like the Evidence page, uses some tactics from Voddie Bauchum.)